I don't read any
I don't care what some idiot journalist thinks about music.

see the quotes on the tv ads and in papers and stuff though
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 12:27, 1 reply, 16 years ago)

If you don't care what they think why bring it up as a reason to be annoyed at U2

(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 12:34, Reply)

ok, it's more a reason to be annoyed at the music press
it means that either a) they don't know about music, b) they don't listen to the stuff they review or c) they are sucking U2s's cocks.

and despite not caring what they say, people being shit at their job, either by being stupid, or deliberately, is annoying
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 12:38, Reply)

d) their opinions* are different to yours.
* professional opinions rather than your amature ones
(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 12:49, Reply)

I don't really think you can have a professional opinion on music in that way

( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 13:04, Reply)

Well, I would consider a music critic's opinion professional,
but that's not the point, the inability of some on here to realise that people can listen to the same piece of music and have totally conflicting ideas about the quality is pretty fucking autism.
(PsychoChomp, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 13:06, Reply)

I do understand what you are saying
it's the level of hype that makes this a (smallish) issue for me.

I can recognise good song writing and such, even if I don't like the music itself, and I think that U2s recent stuff is as amateurish as a lot of stuff I hear from unsigned bands all the time.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 4 Dec 2009, 13:10, Reply)