I've decided I'm going to change my point of view with every reply to this, to see what happens.
Wouldn't it be better to guarntie that everyone gets 3 meals a day and shelter, rather than dennying someone that? You can't say "Someone who's innocent doesn't have, so why should someone guilty have?", it's not one person taking food from another's mouth, if that was the case then I might agree, it's a matter of not having a proper system in place, dispite having one of the best systems in the world.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 5 Jan 2010, 12:35, Reply)