b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 657842 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Women like that are a dime a dozen
Your guitar had better sound nice because it looks dreadful!
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:00, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
shut it
those guitars look fricking awesome
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:01, Reply)
They look like
what a scandinavian would draw if someobody said "Hey Lars, draw me the most cocking, rocking geetar yeah?"
*swishes off in leather kecks doing rock fingers*

That particular guitar bears a frightening resemblance to the Persian Gulf.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:05, Reply)
both of those things are reasons why it looks good
you have proved my point
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:08, Reply)
Hear hear

(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:10, Reply)
but it looks like that bit on the map
the bit that looks like a bug's buggy bits.

I hate guitars with horns.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:11, Reply)
lame
even my acoustic guitar has a pointy bit, much like this one
media.photobucket.com/image/tanglewood%20acoustic/fcorradi/Guitars/Washburn%20Tanglewood/WashburnTanglewood003.jpg
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:15, Reply)
WHY DO THEY HAVE TO HAVE HORNS!
It's tacky.
My Tanglewood would make Francis proud.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:20, Reply)
it's not at all
it looks good.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:21, Reply)
it looks like
"My guitar was well boss but it didn't have enough testosterone"
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:23, Reply)
not at all
it gives it a pleasing asymmetry

it also means you can play much further up the neck. can't play much beyond the 12th fret on standard acoustic guitar, which is no use to anyone.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:25, Reply)
Oh man you've got technical
I was on about aesthetics.
I can only play about 6 chords.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:27, Reply)
it's not all about aesthetics
granted they need to look good, but beyond that it's far more important how they play and sound.

which is why I don't have a Les Paul, because I don't get on with how they play
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:30, Reply)
I used to own one of these
before Dimebag whassis face made them popular. It was stolen. I cried.

www.whitebrosmusic.com/images/dean%20mlx.jpg
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:16, Reply)
now that is horrible
I played a BC Rich Warlock once. fucking awful.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:17, Reply)
it looks so bad it's good
imo. Sounded beeeyoutiful.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:23, Reply)
I've still got one somewhere.
Probably one of the most comfortable guitars I've ever had in my lap.
Looks bloody silly though.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:39, Reply)
And I'M rough???

(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:18, Reply)
hahaha, only teasing
that guitar sounded amazing. Shame I could never take it anywhere as it wouldn't fit in a sodding guitar case.
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:22, Reply)
god is good

(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:25, Reply)
it looks like a treble cleff
it's well classical :P
(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:11, Reply)
Are you kidding?

(, Tue 9 Mar 2010, 16:11, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1