b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 663372 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Moby Dick is fucking TERRIBLE
It's one of the only books I've ever given up on. The insertion of barely-related notes on the whaling industry every few chapters is both pointless and irritating.

People go on about how innovative it is for that reason ('radically challenging the traditional form of the novel' etc)- but if you read the introduction the so-called 'innovation' is laid bare for what it is: Moby Dick was not edited. Those tedious catalogues of types of whales etc are the author's fucking RESEARCH NOTES and were the book to have been edited as it most certainly should have been, the tome would have been improved immeasurably. As it is, it's a load of old cock.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:07, 2 replies, latest was 16 years ago)
I skip those bits and enjoy the story
I like the story, but I hate the research notes
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:22, Reply)
they annoyed me too much, and I admitted defeat.

(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:27, Reply)
One of the only books I've ever given up on is
Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance. Gadd that book goes on.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:25, Reply)
I stopped reading the Silmarillion
far too much "someone son of someone" and I've read this en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nj%C3%A1ls_saga
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 16:36, Reply)
So have I, and greatly enjoyed it.
My translation is by Magnus Magnusson off of that there Mastermind.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:03, Reply)
mine was one I found in a holiday cottage
and have no idea who it was by.

great read though.
(, Mon 15 Mar 2010, 17:15, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1