b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 705930 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I think they're both ok in the right context
'Fish' when talking about multiple creatures of the same type, but 'fishes' when referring to different species.
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:47, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
FFS !
Kill me now.
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:47, Reply)
It is a bit early for massive pedantism
I just can't help it.
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:49, Reply)
Wouldn't that be
'pedantry'?

Or was it deliberate irony?
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:50, Reply)
I don't know, its beyond my lexicon
of words and stuff.
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:55, Reply)
No, no - keep it up. Pedants should pull together.

(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:52, Reply)
I find it funny that pedant and pederast are very similar words.

(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:54, Reply)
They have the same root, or foot if you will.*

*probably - can't be arsed to check.
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:56, Reply)
You can pull your own.
Mine is available for a very select group only.
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:57, Reply)
Pedants?
Is that, like, poor people with speech impediments? Northerners for instance?
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 8:58, Reply)
You're thinking of peasants with cleft palates?
And the rest is tautology.
(, Fri 23 Apr 2010, 9:04, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1