Off Topic
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.
( , Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
yes
doli incapax 'incapable of evil' under the age of 10
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:46, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
doli incapax 'incapable of evil' under the age of 10
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:46, 1 reply, 14 years ago)
Because Enzyme said that if incest is consensual it's ok
So if some child wants to have sex with me, and they're older than 10, it's ok right, and society is stupid for making it illegal.
What's the worst that can happen?
If they're related to me all the better.
OMG ENZYME YOU PEEEDIOTRICIAN!
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:54, Reply)
So if some child wants to have sex with me, and they're older than 10, it's ok right, and society is stupid for making it illegal.
What's the worst that can happen?
If they're related to me all the better.
OMG ENZYME YOU PEEEDIOTRICIAN!
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:54, Reply)
Because you can't make the decision
to have sex until you are 13. You cannot give consent below the age of 13- it's technically rape. Sex between the ages of 13-16 with someone over 18 are still a criminal offence as well I believe.
Doli incapax has to do with the mental capacity to commit a crime.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:57, Reply)
to have sex until you are 13. You cannot give consent below the age of 13- it's technically rape. Sex between the ages of 13-16 with someone over 18 are still a criminal offence as well I believe.
Doli incapax has to do with the mental capacity to commit a crime.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 10:57, Reply)
Oh man the law is an ass
Why does a ten year old get the responsibility to commit one crime with me but not another?
I'm with Enzyme, the law is bollocks.
Can I fuck this kid or not and do I have more of a right to if it's my sister?
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:00, Reply)
Why does a ten year old get the responsibility to commit one crime with me but not another?
I'm with Enzyme, the law is bollocks.
Can I fuck this kid or not and do I have more of a right to if it's my sister?
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:00, Reply)
The reason for doli incapax
is it allows children over the age of 10 to be charged with crimes that they have committed themselves. However a 10 year old having sex with a thirty year old is not a crime *on the 10 year olds part* they are the object and victim of a crime, therefore their age and capacity to recognise evil is irrelevant
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:04, Reply)
is it allows children over the age of 10 to be charged with crimes that they have committed themselves. However a 10 year old having sex with a thirty year old is not a crime *on the 10 year olds part* they are the object and victim of a crime, therefore their age and capacity to recognise evil is irrelevant
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:04, Reply)
Sorry Roota
wait a few years however and you can have carnal knowledge of your cousin all you want, provided they are well fit
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:07, Reply)
wait a few years however and you can have carnal knowledge of your cousin all you want, provided they are well fit
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:07, Reply)
I can imagine the sentence in your normal voice
with an Ali G style "well fit" on the end.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:19, Reply)
with an Ali G style "well fit" on the end.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:19, Reply)
I don't see what the age has to do with it.
The younger someone is, the lower the chance that they could consensually have sex. There are also some adults who could probably not give consent.
I haven't said, and wouldn't say, that it's OK to have sex with an 11-year-old: that's absurd. All I've said is that if an action is consensual, and allowing that no third party is harmed, that removes at least some of the potential objection.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:01, Reply)
The younger someone is, the lower the chance that they could consensually have sex. There are also some adults who could probably not give consent.
I haven't said, and wouldn't say, that it's OK to have sex with an 11-year-old: that's absurd. All I've said is that if an action is consensual, and allowing that no third party is harmed, that removes at least some of the potential objection.
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:01, Reply)
Yeah well if they can consensually commit murder, they can consensually git it awwwn with me, yeeah
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:03, Reply)
( , Sat 11 Sep 2010, 11:03, Reply)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread