b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Off Topic » Post 862870 | Search
This is a question Off Topic

Are you a QOTWer? Do you want to start a thread that isn't a direct answer to the current QOTW? Then this place, gentle poster, is your friend.

(, Sun 1 Apr 2001, 1:00)
Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I'm quite tempted to buy another 166 just for the fuck of it.
especially since they cost about 12p. My last one only broke a bit...
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:28, 1 reply, 16 years ago)
Depending on my mood
I want a 156, 147, 145, 146, GT, GTV, Brera or a GTV6.

I'm a bit of an Alfa slut.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:30, Reply)
but you already have the bestest of all cars
why would you change?
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:32, Reply)
I get bored quickly
buy something on impulse, then spend the entirety of the time I own the new car regretting the loss of the old one. So then I buy a new one on impulse and regret the one I just sold.

ad infinitum
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:34, Reply)
I've had a 156, 166 and a GTV.
only the 166 actually really broke down on me, but I tend not to keep them for more than a year. Plus, it didn't "break down" as such. Just behaved interestingly.

I'd like a Brera but they just don't drive very well. My 156 was a lowered SP3 ex-demo car and it's one of the best handling cars I've ever had. And I've had an S2000.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:32, Reply)
My Z4 M handled well - did a few track days in it. Quicker and less skittish than the TVR I had before

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:36, Reply)
Driven by wifeswappers, though. ;)
My mate has an atomic breadvan, that's pretty tidy. I imagine the drive is similar.

The S2000 was mental on a track but a bit too much on the road, the power delivery is too brutal, plus you had to rev the nuts off it to get the power and then it would only do about 70 miles on a tank of super, which isn't cheap.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:41, Reply)
doesn't an S2000 rev to 9000 rpm or something daft?
Got taken out in an Arial Atom last year - quickest thing I have ever experience except for the 600RR bike I used to have.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:45, Reply)
redlines at 9000, yeah.
the top end of the power doesn't come in until about 7-7500 though, which makes it fine on the track but a bit iffy on the road, because you're constantly driving round at less than 3/4 power so as not to make small children cry with the noise, and then you'll forget, bury it off a roundabout in the wet, rev into the power band and find yourself going backwards at 50. Not from repeated personal experience, oh no.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:51, Reply)
*strikes S2000 from list of potential cars*
the list of convertibles that I can allow myself to buy is rapidly dwindling...
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:56, Reply)
How tall are you as well?
My friend has an S2000 and he is 6'3. He looks like a dick in it.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:00, Reply)
If you are over 6' you look a dick in any convertible.

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:01, Reply)
*cries*

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:04, Reply)
Don't worry
you look a dick out of a convertable
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:07, Reply)
at least I can spell convertible
IN YOUR FACE
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:09, Reply)
6'2

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:01, Reply)
Don't write it off.
It is an epically brilliant car, and a work of engineering genius. nearly 250 bhp from a normally aspirated 1998 cc 4 cylinder engine? Genius. But if you don't respect it in the wet it will bite.

It also costs best part of £1000 to replace the clutch and it eats tyres and brake pads, especially on the track. And if you run it on anything other than Bridgestone S02s you will die a bit on fire backwards through a hedge. But I loved it.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:01, Reply)
it does sound like fun
but something a little less hungry for wearing parts would be nice.

Plus, my mrs will be driving it some of the time at least, and I'd rather not buy a car that will lead directly to her death.

I mainly just want a convertible, not overly concerned with performance, beyond a certain point, as I'm used to driving diesels.

I'm quite fond of the old Porsche 944 convertible at the moment, particularly as there aren't many around.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:03, Reply)
What about a BMW 328 convertible? (Cheaper than the 330 and a better drive than the 325)

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:07, Reply)
tempting
and arguably more practical

it's not going to be for a while, particularly as I need to buy a van first
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:10, Reply)
CLKs are cheap now
plus you get back seats. Or do you want a 2 seater.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:11, Reply)
not reay to rule anything out at this stage
I'm in the long term dreaming phase of the plan at the moment.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:15, Reply)
expensive parts on a Merc though, plus CLK's have a reputation for dodgy electricals

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:17, Reply)
I'm used to that
the electricals in my car have been done by the Spanish
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:19, Reply)
That's why I liked my M - 3.2 straight 6 gave it power all through the rev range. At 336 bhp it was still entertaining in the wet though

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:05, Reply)
I'm tempted to just knock my dad out and nick his Z3
I will at least have a less gay car than my mates who drive MX5s and MGFs
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:07, Reply)
I did a standing quarter mile in my Z4 against a Z3 - Z3 was almost as quick 5 speed box v my 6 speed was the only thing that held it back a bit

(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 11:08, Reply)
Overall, I want a GT 2.0
I love the older style boxy styling. But the 156 is probably the most practical answer. Of course it's an Alfa, so why bother with practical? Blah blah eternal spiral of lust and misery.

The only thing putting me off a 156 etc is the 600 pound clutch. And the cambelt needs doing every 36000 miles.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:37, Reply)
yeah. Still, buy one at 40,000 miles and sell it at 70,000.
Job done.
(, Mon 13 Sep 2010, 10:42, Reply)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 837, 836, 835, 834, 833, ... 1