It should be edition OF.

( thealternativefact, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:03, 2 replies, latest was 15 years ago)

Oh ffs I'm thick.
Thanks.
( Lampito rise with the moon, go to bed with the sun, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:04, Reply)

You really are.

( Monty Boyce, My cheese game is strong, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:09, Reply)

I'd say it should be "ADDITION to"
personally.

Either way, isn't it a spelling not a grammar error?
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:21, Reply)

Depends whether you're looking at it like most people.
or you're being pedantic just to be annoying.
See below.
( thealternativefact, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:24, Reply)

It could be either, I agree.
"Addition to" makes so much more sense though. And I'm not being pedantic, I would have said they'd made a spelling error. I presume they asked for it over the phone and were misunderstood by the signwriters.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:29, Reply)

I'm being pedantic.
( thealternativefact, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:43, Reply)

ah. The correct us of "you're" fooled me.
That never happens on the internet.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Fri 15 Oct 2010, 10:44, Reply)