Agreed
They're is no reason for it.
(Eeevil You are losers, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 2:27, 1 reply)

'Should of' instead of 'should have'
I keep seeing 'should of' instead of 'should have' - sometimes in the more august broadsheets. If they won't defend proper grammar, who will?
(Goes back to growling into the Telegraph)
(reinvented, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 8:08, closed)

anybody who replaces
have with of after a modal should have all genitals severed/mutilated by a rusty-chainsaw-wielding spacker.

I used to teach this to children - anybody who used of instead of have was sent into the babies classroom, and made to sing and dance (for everyone's amusement - an english academy where the walls were all made of glass)
(bamboozled Can hear you getting fatter, Sat 3 Apr 2010, 11:24, closed)