fair point
I'm a squishy scientist (biology/psychology) so physics really isn't my strong suit...

Related but not actually relevant:

Isn't our entire universe dependent on all the forces we know of being exactly how they are? ie if any one force was stronger/weaker then life probably wouldn't be here?
(ElectricSexPants would like to be the Sultan of something, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 13:58, 2 replies)

You could make the case that if the forces were different life wouldn't have arisen
It's a tautology, like Douglas Adams pointed out - whatever happens, happens. If you subscribe to the "many worlds" hypothesis, you might argue that there are billions of universes where the forces were slightly different, and they don't contain life.
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 14:01, closed)

Alternate Universes
Now we're getting into the lovely world of string theory with alternate/splitting dimensions. :)
(Magus Zeal reloading since, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 18:26, closed)

You don't really need string theory for that.

(Shippy likes linebreaks and doesn't care what you think, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 20:17, closed)

Not necessarily
There is some evidence that the laws may be subtly different in distant reaches of space, and also that they aren't constant.

I heard a nice theory once that if the entire quantum state of the universe is able to tunnel from state to state (electrons can do it, on a much smaller scale) then the laws of physics will shift by immesurably small bits until they are in a ratio that would co-incidentally allow life to arise, at which point it would, and be surprised that it had done so.
( MatJ LOOK, Tue 6 Apr 2010, 23:16, closed)