Protest!
Sit-ins. Walk-outs. Smashing up the headquarters of a major political party. Chaining yourself to the railings outside your local sweet shop because they changed Marathons to Snickers. How have you stuck it to The Man?
( , Thu 11 Nov 2010, 12:24)
Sit-ins. Walk-outs. Smashing up the headquarters of a major political party. Chaining yourself to the railings outside your local sweet shop because they changed Marathons to Snickers. How have you stuck it to The Man?
( , Thu 11 Nov 2010, 12:24)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
They must be well trained
I couldn't stop a brick with a baton.
But seriously, you can have the shields, maybe you can have the fireproof balaclavas (ha, yeah...), but what's with the sticks and lack of name badges?
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 13:49, closed)
I couldn't stop a brick with a baton.
But seriously, you can have the shields, maybe you can have the fireproof balaclavas (ha, yeah...), but what's with the sticks and lack of name badges?
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 13:49, closed)
Wasn't t he
the shield, baton, balaclava & no numbers combination was brought in so picketing miners could be beaten to shit with no comeback?
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 13:53, closed)
the shield, baton, balaclava & no numbers combination was brought in so picketing miners could be beaten to shit with no comeback?
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 13:53, closed)
Sheid and balaclava have been dealt with
Baton for self defence.
Covering up numbers no one is condoning.
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 13:58, closed)
Baton for self defence.
Covering up numbers no one is condoning.
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 13:58, closed)
Doesn't the covering of numbers
indicate that the cop in question is going out prepared to commit a crime, and is planning to do so.
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 14:03, closed)
indicate that the cop in question is going out prepared to commit a crime, and is planning to do so.
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 14:03, closed)
Did you not see the bit about no one condoning the removal of numbers?
In the same way that I'm sure you would not condone anyone using a peaceful protest as a cover for attacking the police or property.
You would - wouldn't you?
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 14:08, closed)
In the same way that I'm sure you would not condone anyone using a peaceful protest as a cover for attacking the police or property.
You would - wouldn't you?
( , Thu 18 Nov 2010, 14:08, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread