You have to be realistic.
Of course fat bob isn't going to save the tigers or rainforests and if that was your only care than you'd be right to carry on paying to the WWF.

But what if it was just pet welfare? Your money would best be spent donated to the local cats/dog protection kennels than the RSPCA, for example.
( Airman Gabber Living life like a 70's BBC presenter, Wed 16 Nov 2011, 15:54, 1 reply)

Are cats and dogs really in danger of going extinct?
I thought we had loads of them
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Wed 16 Nov 2011, 15:59, closed)

I said welfare!
Not extinction.
( Airman Gabber Living life like a 70's BBC presenter, Wed 16 Nov 2011, 16:04, closed)

Can they put nappies on cats
cause one of them keeps shitting in my garden.

I'd gladly send some of your money to pay for that.
(username failed moderation, Wed 16 Nov 2011, 16:13, closed)

When giving to charity I save cash by not donating to pet charities in the first place
Spending money to look after animals that we have a huge surplus of is just bad economics in the first place
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Wed 16 Nov 2011, 16:20, closed)

We have a surplus of pensioners too.

( Airman Gabber Living life like a 70's BBC presenter, Wed 16 Nov 2011, 16:49, closed)

Eh, I'm not completely against euthanasia
though I'd prefer higher levels of abortion in the first place
( emvee cruor deo cruoris, Wed 16 Nov 2011, 17:02, closed)

you're just a visionary.
and largely unappreciated in your own time.
(Gritty, yet fluffy. kipperpillock is obsessed with me =), Thu 17 Nov 2011, 1:06, closed)