data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a question"
We once made a flash animation for a record company. They told us it was brilliant and 30 staff gave us a round of applause. They asked us to stick it out without their name on it. Then their legal department sent us a cease and desist for infringing their copyright. How have you been screwed over?
( , Fri 3 Aug 2012, 13:46)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
I think that either a) he's admitting just how crap and blurry his old TV was or b) he's frantically trying to justify to himself and everyone else spending a small fortune on equipment and buying every film yet again, having only just finished replacing all his VHS with DVD.
( , Tue 7 Aug 2012, 10:36, 1 reply)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
If it was standard 35mm film then yes, DVD is as good as it would get without adding extra sharpening effects.
( , Tue 7 Aug 2012, 10:44, closed)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a QotW comment"
However cost cutting meant that most British shows (Doctor Who included) were shot on video tape, so I doubt they would benefit from a blu ray transfer.
( , Tue 7 Aug 2012, 15:32, closed)
« Go Back | See The Full Thread