I don't particularly think it counts as harrassment
as plenty have said, if you don't like it then don't read it. The internet is open to all, and if some want to express themselves by saying they don't like, or aren't reading, someone else's posts then who are you, or anyone else, to say they can't?

what is worse in fact, is people complaining to the mods on the behalf of others to get someone banned.
Saying you don't like a post, or aren't reading it is hardly a banning offence.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 11:51, 1 reply)

Fair enough
but declaring that anyone who follows Spanky's posts and likes them is a twat is out of order too. Works both ways.
(Irish Lobster, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 11:56, closed)

not going to argue with you there
my points aren't really related to the original poster or the content
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 11:59, closed)

But when there is a well defined group of regulars who repeatedly (ad nauseum)
go on and on about how shit another poster is, it does become a form of bullying. That and it's just plain weird how some people get so fucking worked up about one person's usually very popular posts. I don't get it.

We should save our rants and raves about important stuff like how the government is hiding real UFO stuff and how all of our leaders are actually clones of Joseph Stalin. You know, the real stuff that really matters.
(MichaelS wasn't picked again, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 12:23, closed)

I suspect Stalin clones would do a better job
they would have better moustaches too.
( Vipros. clever got me this far, then tricky got me in, Fri 29 Jan 2010, 12:33, closed)