b3ta.com qotw
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Question of the Week » Stupid Colleagues » Post 1105780 | Search
This is a question Stupid Colleagues

Godwin's Lawyer tells us: "I once worked with a lad who believed 'Frankenstein' was based on a true story, and that the book was written by Shirley Bassey." Tell us about your workplace dopes.

(, Thu 3 Mar 2011, 15:34)
Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

I never once
used baby talk in addressing my kids, even as infants.

Adults should speak as adults and correct the kids' pronunciations as they get older so they don't sound like idiots.
(, Thu 3 Mar 2011, 15:56, 5 replies)
^

(, Thu 3 Mar 2011, 16:24, closed)

Though there is evidence that making baby *noises* before they can talk does help their language development (I didn't do it much, it made me feel a bit of a pillock).

I correct my kids' pronunciation all the time, but that's usually because I don't want them to sound too Australian (some Australian pronunciation is just plain lazy).

(ducks and runs for cover)
(, Thu 3 Mar 2011, 17:18, closed)
don't be too quick to dismiss baby talk
Repetitive single syllable utterances increase an infant's exposure to the sounds needed to create words. Infant phonics if you will. Shows small children that their mouth is good for something other than drooling. (No maddie jokes please)

I totally understand where you are coming from though. Many a time I have had to listen to an English teacher preaching about how, if you mutilate the English language in a suitably retarded Glaswegian fashion, it magically transforms into another language. Scots?!
(, Thu 3 Mar 2011, 23:02, closed)
Not true.
A child will become a fluent speaker of their native language by the age of 5 even if you don't talk to them at all. Around them seems to be enough. No training is neccecary. Babies have awareness of the phonetic system of their language even at birth. Language acquisition is not based on imitation.
There's a tribe in Africa that routinely teaches children (with actual classes) to walk. Why? Well, "if we don't then maybe they won't learn," etc, etc. Same deal with baby talk.
(, Sat 5 Mar 2011, 12:21, closed)
not true?
What part?

I agree that a child will learn a language without being spoken to directly but the end result will be very different. I am sure we could rely on children to figure a lot of things out for themselves but culturally most of us tend to give them w hand every now and then.
(, Mon 7 Mar 2011, 20:05, closed)
^ This
with elocution lessons for good measure.
(, Fri 4 Mar 2011, 2:47, closed)
First line good, second line bad.
There's no need to "correct" anyone's pronunciation.
(, Sat 5 Mar 2011, 12:16, closed)
Sure there is.
If your child is mispronouncing a word and is not corrected, they assume they are saying it right, and even once they realise their mistake, may continue using the wrong pronunciation as they are in the habit by then.
It bothers me endlessly when my son picks up americanisms and southernisms from TV, I couldn't just leave him talking about 'Mr. Tamble' or asking for a 'liddle bit' of something.
(, Sun 6 Mar 2011, 22:04, closed)

« Go Back | See The Full Thread

Pages: Latest, 11, 10, 9, 8, 7, ... 1