Actually
I don't mean to be anal, althoughI am about to be anyway, but I work closely with the sales of goods act, and if the product fits any of the following:


It was not 'as described'

It was not 'of satisfactory quality'

It was not 'fit for purpose'


Then she had every right to her money back, regardless of whether it was a sale item or not. 100's of stores do successfully get away with strange variations on that, but only because people don't challenge them.

That said, if it didn't fit any of the above, then your or any other stores are under no obligation to do anything at all. A lot do, because its good PR, but they don't have to.

None of that changes the fact that she sounds like a right cow either.
( scarpe We Stole Bikes, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 16:51, 3 replies)

she say it was because her son didnt like it.


She can fuck off to the moon, i dont even work for the store
(i should have joined myspace, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 17:02, closed)

Yeah
She has no rights no matter what price she paid for it if that's the case.
( scarpe We Stole Bikes, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 17:08, closed)

What would 'not fit for purpose' count as if it was a shirt?
If its too big or something?
(i should have joined myspace, Wed 29 Oct 2008, 17:13, closed)

Some examples
Badly torn
Badly stained, if sold as new
No buttons
Goat
No arms
Skirt
(teebie jeebie, Thu 30 Oct 2008, 12:47, closed)

why even argue?
I would call the middle-management tosser out of the break room and let him deal with it for his extra 25p an hour etc.
(bazmorningstar efil4nat3b, Thu 30 Oct 2008, 9:47, closed)