"mild invective" & "a few"?
Also, maybe in future the mods could make more of an effort to enforce the rules around here.
Particularly in terms of b3tan's personal RL details NOT being freely posted.
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 12:19, 1 reply)

They do.
You just don't get a personal message about it every time.

And again: you are ignoring them. So how come you know everything they are saying? Either take them off ignore or stop logging out to torment yourself.
( chthonic, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 12:26, closed)

Quite.

(McChinaman banned, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:04, closed)

He isn't going to do either of those things, top mod Chthonic.
You should just ban him.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:06, closed)

Yeah,
since this was the guy who has repeatedly posted my RL details on this board with seemingly no intervention from the mods whatsoever, despite me asking him and them not to, you should totes ban me.
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:17, closed)

You've just been told to stop logging out or take me off ignore.
Do one, or do one.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:24, closed)

Maybe you should.
Since there is no way you could reading this unless you yourself were logging out to read it and then posing whilst logging in.
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:27, closed)

The difference being I haven't made an active choice to ignore you.
If you put someone on ignore, ignore them and stop being an attention seeking prick.
( BraynDedd Natasha Kaplinsky's labia majora, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:42, closed)

He's been banned once.
Again ... something most moderated boards can handle with relative ease. Even this place finally managed to deter Boudicca. And Ringo is just a tesco value Bou without the amusing hysterics.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:20, closed)

Stepped.
More than once I'll admit, but only ever stepped.

And you my learned friend are surely the latest iteration of an iPhone operating system.
(s0ckpuppet logging out to reply to you if you're not careful, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 13:25, closed)

Can't you just give him his own special personal setting
Wherein he can't see anyones post logged while logged in, and no-one can see his posts whether logged in or out?
( Muns, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 14:01, closed)

Isn't that a rather convoluted way of just banning him?

( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 14:04, closed)

Not at all.
He can still post, it's just that he's forced to have his own personal ignore 2.0 that works.
( Muns, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 14:10, closed)

Ah. Gotcha.
And then we ban him.
( Dr. Shambolic je suis charlie, Fri 20 Sep 2013, 15:04, closed)