
Universalpsykopath tugs our coat and says: Tell us about your feats of deduction and the little mysteries you've solved. Alternatively, tell us about the simple, everyday things that mystified you for far too long.
( , Thu 13 Oct 2011, 12:52)
« Go Back

I hope I can explain this. I want someone who's faaaar less lazy than I am to work out what pages, ie, at what points in time, do you get the good answers, or better stories, as evidenced by being chosen for the Newsletter. I reckon that the the more keen posters will post good stories early, but who knows. Maybe it takes a few days, ie pages, for people to work out their ever-so-thriling tales.
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 18:21, 8 replies)

Then there's a levelling off for a day or so as the quality gradually improves, peaking at wednesday lunchtime, dropping off rapidly into Thursday.
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 18:36, closed)

surely they would ungainly shuffle or simply roll in on etc ?
not being a cunt but just interested
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 19:09, closed)

I'm no statistician but
Then again this probably makes more sense.

( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 20:42, closed)

( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 19:22, closed)

Work? Wassat? Surely no one here can be gainfully employable...
( , Wed 19 Oct 2011, 20:31, closed)

There's a burst of good stories at the beginning, as people are instantly reminded of them, when reading the QOTW; then a lull, before building to the main peak, then another lull before a late burst of "oh, I just remembered another one":

( , Thu 20 Oct 2011, 9:28, closed)
« Go Back