more or less moral?
This does not compute.

Try: have morals changed?
( rnuk http://flickr.com/rnuk, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:43, archived)

It's hard to quantify
but I would say I have a reading of 6.8 on the moral thermometer.
( comrade yannovski and then, of course, there was the schnapps monkey, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:45, archived)

I think I get it.
maybe are people more motivated by morals than they were 100 years ago, in which case I would say less morally driven.
( icklepeach *relurks*, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:45, archived)

It all depends on where you get your morals from
you might get them from religion, in which case, I would venture that, particularly in the west, that less people base their morals on religion now than did then.

Or you could be a relativist, and have no basis for morals other than what you think is right or wrong.

I could go on. But I won't.
( rnuk http://flickr.com/rnuk, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:46, archived)

The interesting question is are we less virtuous than before?
I heart Aristotle.
( TFD is sporting this season's finest necropants, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:54, archived)

She didn't ask about pedanticism.

( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:47, archived)

The question is intrisically flawed
I'm not being pedantic.
( rnuk http://flickr.com/rnuk, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:48, archived)

Wrong
more or fewer people could behave in a way according to an ethical framework, or purely from opportunistic self-interest, or irrationally.
( Flapjack I spay a little mare for you, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:54, archived)