b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 2445808

Do you think people are more or less moral than they were 100 years ago?
Or the same?
A)more
B)less
C)same
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:42, archived)
more or less moral?
This does not compute.

Try: have morals changed?
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:43, archived)
It's hard to quantify
but I would say I have a reading of 6.8 on the moral thermometer.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:45, archived)
I think I get it.
maybe are people more motivated by morals than they were 100 years ago, in which case I would say less morally driven.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:45, archived)
It all depends on where you get your morals from
you might get them from religion, in which case, I would venture that, particularly in the west, that less people base their morals on religion now than did then.

Or you could be a relativist, and have no basis for morals other than what you think is right or wrong.

I could go on. But I won't.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:46, archived)
The interesting question is are we less virtuous than before?
I heart Aristotle.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:54, archived)
She didn't ask about pedanticism.

(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:47, archived)
The question is intrisically flawed
I'm not being pedantic.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:48, archived)
Wrong
more or fewer people could behave in a way according to an ethical framework, or purely from opportunistic self-interest, or irrationally.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:54, archived)
d) Different

(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:43, archived)
I wrote a song about you this morning I hope you saw it and liked it.

(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:44, archived)
MEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEMEME

(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:45, archived)
Yes.
MEMEMEMEMEMEEMMEEMEMEMEMMEMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMEE.
And?
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:46, archived)
It's more about Rosie
but it's the closest I will ever get to the popular page, so for this I thank you.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:48, archived)
It's ovbously going to 'less', they were fucking cunts 100 years ago.
How can the awnser be anything else?
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:44, archived)

www.b3ta.com/talk/2445816
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:44, archived)
Ok, you're right on that.
I'll blame it on the lack of lunch, that i'll go and have now.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:46, archived)
I say nuke the fuckers

(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:44, archived)
the same, morality is not a sliding scale
it is merely a field on which you may occupy a different position.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:44, archived)
what an eloquent answer.
I vote you for president.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:46, archived)
hello binky
I've not said hello to you all day.

Hello.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:50, archived)
hello russell.
i have been quite work-busy today.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:51, archived)
how on earth would we know in great enough detail
we didn't live then

people are cunts, they always have been and they always will
its the way of the world
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:46, archived)
I'm people, and I don't think i'm a cunt.

(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:47, archived)
Quick
declare yourself a minority.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:49, archived)
I'm considering this, what benfits do the goverment give to dyslexics with small penises?

(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:52, archived)
People these days are less rule-based.
There's less respect for law and authority. But that's not the same as morality.

So I don't think people are any more or less moral than they used to be, they're just not so rigid in their application of it.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:46, archived)
You can't get a proper answer to this
as morality changes. Whether someone is deemed as 'moral' depends on society's definition of morality at that exact point in time.
(, Fri 12 Jan 2007, 13:47, archived)