no, come off it.
you can't stop people having fantasies about stabbing you to death either, but you wouldn't want to know about it.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:14, archived)
you can't stop people having fantasies about stabbing you to death either, but you wouldn't want to know about it.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:14, archived)
CIRCULAR ARGUMENT.
What if it's NOT rape?
How can a thought be rape? Really? How?
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:20, archived)
What if it's NOT rape?
How can a thought be rape? Really? How?
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:20, archived)
by being non consensual.
I don't consent to being thought about in a sexy way.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:21, archived)
I don't consent to being thought about in a sexy way.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:21, archived)
You can't consent to a thought process in someone else's mind.
You can't censor someone else's thoughts.
Sorry to push this one, but if 'God' gave us freewill, he essentially signed a waiver on your behalf.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:23, archived)
You can't censor someone else's thoughts.
Sorry to push this one, but if 'God' gave us freewill, he essentially signed a waiver on your behalf.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:23, archived)
Well, quite.
That's exactly why it would make me feel used, and actually really quite powerless.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:25, archived)
That's exactly why it would make me feel used, and actually really quite powerless.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:25, archived)
You're actually mental.
I'd suggest removing all five of your senses, and becoming a PVS mong.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:28, archived)
I'd suggest removing all five of your senses, and becoming a PVS mong.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:28, archived)
And how many chaps have you ever thought about in a sexy way?
Seriously, it's human nature, you can't help urges. With your rules, pretty much everyone would end up in prison.
I can sort of understand what you mean, objectification and all that (you great big feminist), but there's nothing that can stop it. It's just part of life.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:24, archived)
Seriously, it's human nature, you can't help urges. With your rules, pretty much everyone would end up in prison.
I can sort of understand what you mean, objectification and all that (you great big feminist), but there's nothing that can stop it. It's just part of life.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:24, archived)
I'm not actually advocating putting people in prison for thinking about sex.
Although in answer to your question: none.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:26, archived)
Although in answer to your question: none.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:26, archived)
It's fair enough if sex just doesn't do it for you
but you can't expect sexytime daydreams not to happen. It just....doesn't work like that.
And I know you're not advocating imprisonment, that was my extreme example :)
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:29, archived)
but you can't expect sexytime daydreams not to happen. It just....doesn't work like that.
And I know you're not advocating imprisonment, that was my extreme example :)
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:29, archived)
no it just wouldn't make me feel very good
if someone told me about it.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:34, archived)
if someone told me about it.
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:34, archived)
He's not imagining raping you
he's imagining you consenting and enjoying it. If you got a text saying "hi hun been thinking about raping u, got me hot, xx" or something, I'd see your point.
If he was enjoying daydreaming about going to the park with you for a lovely walk, would you object on the grounds that you don't like going to the park?
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:25, archived)
he's imagining you consenting and enjoying it. If you got a text saying "hi hun been thinking about raping u, got me hot, xx" or something, I'd see your point.
If he was enjoying daydreaming about going to the park with you for a lovely walk, would you object on the grounds that you don't like going to the park?
( , Mon 10 Dec 2007, 13:25, archived)