Did they have to shoot him in the head?
Why not the arm, to disable him rather than kill? I'd hope cops would have good enough aim to do that. What was he doing?
( KersaI Missive Free Michael Shields! with Monday's Liverpool Echo, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:47, archived)

if you want someone not to fire back
a head shot is the best solution as the they will have no more thoughts.
( Tyronne Get To Falkirk, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:48, archived)

you could shoot them in the gun

( scott,, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:49, archived)

size of gun vs size of head
which one would you shoot?
( Tyronne Get To Falkirk, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:50, archived)

i'm a lover not a shooter

( scott,, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:51, archived)

^this
the police logic is to take out the shooter, then worry about civil liberties later.
( wynoh kills threads by his mere presence, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:50, archived)

But then you have a massive and expensive enquiry into the death of the suspect
A live suspect can still answer questions.
( KersaI Missive Free Michael Shields! with Monday's Liverpool Echo, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:50, archived)

but no lives lost aside from the prick who tried his luck.

( Tyronne Get To Falkirk, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:51, archived)

Tosh
They aim for the torso, because they're not going to get up from that, and they're less likely to miss.

The shooter is responsible for the bullet until it stops.

It also isn't likely to go through a torso.
( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:53, archived)

oh come now
who is going to listen to someone who watches hollyoaks?
( Tyronne Get To Falkirk, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:56, archived)

Rape, his brain was in his balls, so no real damnage was done to him.

( G/PP 💩💩💩💩💩&#128, Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:49, archived)

You always shoot to kill.
Why else would you shoot someone? To tease them?

It's dangerous to them.
( Syncubus Yarr! Ye'll be walking Planck's Constant! [GMT-5], Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:51, archived)