
...about 200 yards from me. Think that is the first time I have been in the presence of a shooting. Was very exciting!
But it does ask the simple question. When a police officer (or group thereof), tell you to get out of the vehicle, or they will shoot you, do you..
a) Get out of the vehicle, get arrested and remain safe thereafter, maybe except for the inevitable bumrape and years of being someones bitch whilst serving your sentence.
b) get shot in the head.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:42, archived)

[edit] but I'd do as I was told
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:43, archived)

for some unknown reason, I have come to respect people trained in the use of, and holding a firearm! And this is coming from me, and man that grew up in the UK with no experience of firearms at all until I moved over to Seattle 6 months ago. How do these people not learn? Or is this Darwinism in progress?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:46, archived)

How hard was the emigration process? The UK to Seattle is the exact thing I want to do.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:47, archived)

I'm only here on a three year work visa, and even with work sponsorship and paying for it to be fast tracked it took about 7 months to get through it all. The only bad part (except for the timescales) is the interview at the US Embassy...they give you an interview time, andthen when you arrive, you begin queueing for approx. 4-5 hours in a crowded hall. And then the interview itself lasts for maybe 3 minutes at most. Very annoying!
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:51, archived)

That interview sounds 'fun'.
Cheers :)
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:52, archived)

Canada seems cool though. Bilingual, young and able to support myself, scored well on the 'how suitable are you' site from them.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:54, archived)

So that'd be useful for them I'm sure.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:57, archived)

I could move permanently if I invested in a business supporting 10 American citizens, but it's about half a million dollars minimum.
Whoops.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:58, archived)

the permanent visa is apparently even more of a bitch to get, you have to essentially prove that whatever job you will be looking for cannot already be completed by an American! By doing it this way, I am basically working in the job for a couple of years, then will go home and begin the process for permanent visa knowing that I've suddenly got specialized knowledge.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:57, archived)

not many americans can do that.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:59, archived)

qotw would have a whipround to pay your airfare
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:53, archived)

not seen you round these parts before, but often admired your QOTW work.
How's things?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:56, archived)

which i managed to say to a client earlier when he asked how i was..... fucksocks.
how's you tonight?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:59, archived)

heheh. It's amazing what you can get away with when talking to clients.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:04, archived)

stupid weather turning my brain to mush then raining at the weekend!
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:06, archived)

you can tell when it's my day off, it's invariably pissing down.
Apart from that, life's all good. I have two (rainy) days off, so I'm happy. Even if it's shit weather.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:12, archived)

Nothing is good.
Downtime is very necessary. I'm going to do as little as possible.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:24, archived)

doing fuck all. i've got to evict a gang of hairy biker squatters tomorrow if you want to swop...
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:29, archived)

( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:57, archived)

www.b3ta.com/questions/disappointment/post188275
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:58, archived)

wonderful stuff
i can't believe the amount of pandering going on on this fucking website. It's not a lonely hearts site or a meeting place for the developmentally retarded.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:00, archived)

..the amount of ladies willing to accept sweaty gazzes from spotty sexual inadequates is shrinking by the day.
Thus the panderers are switching their attentions to the pretty boy.
Only yesterday I received 3 gazzes asking for my MSN from Master of Turnips, 7 from Sexface and 967 from Syncubus.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:05, archived)

I do - every day in fact, when I go to work. And I don't need to resort to the internet to find a partner, unlike some people I could mention.
Please feel free to dismiss this inconvenient statement of facts as "dull" and project your own psychological insecurities onto me as necessary.
Oh, and I might also mention that I don't flirt with fat failures online in a desperate bid to justify my pointless existence to a world that doesn't really care.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:03, archived)

i don't have the energy to be rude to everyone, it's too hot. i'm sure you've never had to resort to the internet to pull.
bloody hell you're harsh! that was not flirting.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:10, archived)

and this is why I accept that it may just be Natures way of removing the truly retarded from the remaining pool of the mildly stupid.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:52, archived)

I lived in Marysville when I was 10-13.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:51, archived)

Found a place with a great view of Mt. Rainier. I still spend a few evening just staring out the window and occasionally thinking "Wow, that is a huge f*cking mountain!"
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:54, archived)

I'd love to move back, I love Marysville and Everett...anything on I5 really, haha.
I went with Dad on his work visa for 3 years, then back to the UK.
Went last summer to Marysville though, will be back again this Xmas.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:55, archived)

we went up there when I was over in June and it was all foggy and you couldn't see much but it was still awesome :D
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:58, archived)

thanks for your kind words!
strangely I haven't actually been up to Rainier yet, will be going in the next few weeks, whenever we have good weather, and I'm not on call with work. Should be good fun to see up close.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:02, archived)

Really enjoyed going to the rainforesty area too - you have to take a ferry to it and its quite a drive but it was really surreal to be in this massive thick forest and think "One of the biggest cities in the world is about an hour away".
Brill
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 23:06, archived)

Or whatever it is we're supposed to be vehemently opposed to these days.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:43, archived)

WHERE ARE YOU BOU I NEED MY DEPTHS PLUMBED NIGGA
/syncubus blog
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:44, archived)

( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:45, archived)

Can I stick my dad's jelly cock into your shelf?
Yarrrrrp!
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:45, archived)

it's fucking brilliant
*falls over like a twat*
WHAT THE FUCK LOL
*Oh god I'm funny*
*WHy am I using so many asterisks*
ur all dull roadkill pie i put it on my balls
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:47, archived)

HE CAME DOWN FROM HEAVEN TO SAVE OUR SOULS, AND THIS IS HOW YOU REPAY HIM? YOU DIGUST ME. YOU DESERVE TO BE GASSED TO DEATH.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:47, archived)

And why did they automatically shoot this person? Did that person have a gun?
It seems ridiculous to shoot someone because they wouldn't get out of a car...but then I've wanted to shoot people for far less...
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:45, archived)

I know that they had just robbed a bank a few miles away, so the assumption is that they probably had guns themselves, and were probably stupid enough to draw said guns in front of the police.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:48, archived)

yea, I bet they wouldn't get out of the car the fucking pussies.
Let's think...free meals, clothes, education, bed and sex for a while or....DIE.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:50, archived)

I know when I'm out-gunned.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:46, archived)

Why not the arm, to disable him rather than kill? I'd hope cops would have good enough aim to do that. What was he doing?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:47, archived)

a head shot is the best solution as the they will have no more thoughts.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:48, archived)

the police logic is to take out the shooter, then worry about civil liberties later.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:50, archived)

A live suspect can still answer questions.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:50, archived)

They aim for the torso, because they're not going to get up from that, and they're less likely to miss.
The shooter is responsible for the bullet until it stops.
It also isn't likely to go through a torso.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:53, archived)

who is going to listen to someone who watches hollyoaks?
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:56, archived)

( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:49, archived)

Why else would you shoot someone? To tease them?
It's dangerous to them.
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:51, archived)

( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:48, archived)

( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:50, archived)

my comment still stands, with minor adjustment
( , Tue 1 Jul 2008, 22:52, archived)