
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:39, archived)

because lesbians get a proper bona fide a-list celebrity type who is actually famous for something else, not like Ellen DeGeneres who frankly was just on a not-very-good sitcom beforehand
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:47, archived)

I still think Madonna is pretty shit for promoting Kabbalah like it's something most Jews believe in. No, it's a fashion trend. Being Jewish is more than tying a red piece of string around your wrist and calling yourself mystical.
Yeah, so, like that, I guess.
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:50, archived)

simply because she is pretty and famous?
If she looked like Cynthia Nixon's girlfriend, would you accuse her of attention seeking and someone who is 'trying an identity'?
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:55, archived)

( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:57, archived)

It's showbusiness, any publicity is good publicity, especially if you don't have some film to promote. I have a healthy skepticism of all overexposed celebrities.
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:57, archived)

If someone was 'trying the identity' I would have expected a million photos of her snogging Samantha's face off.
As it is, they've been together ages, and LiLo has just come out. She seems a lot happier too (as both myself and Limey have pointed out).
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 23:02, archived)

by a stupidly conservative industry?
She's calmed down a lot since she's been with Samantha. Which is a good thing. I like the Lohan.
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:53, archived)

I do apologise, I shall smile and nod next time you make say something daft. I'd hate to offend your delicate sensibilities by having a different opinion than you.
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 23:04, archived)

She looks happier and healthier now than she has since Mean Girls (speaking of which, LiLo is the ONLY person I can think of who looks at their best fatter and gingerer). And Sam Ronson seems nice and normal.
( , Fri 26 Sep 2008, 22:56, archived)