Retard?
I hardly think that insults are a valid part of a rational argument.

My comment does not rule out genetics. Please see the part of my comment that says "the level of success will vary".

A genetic predisposition for fair skin, fine bones and large breasts makes you more beautiful than average. Attractiveness is measure of success for porn stars. Indeed it is a contributing factor to the distinction between 'star' and 'actress'. You are correct that attitude plays a part. Neither one however is the sole gauge.
( Ratsta, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:08, archived)

Now read Jenk's original post and see how irrelevant what you said is.

( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:15, archived)

...
He saw an attractive young woman with large hooters and observed that she was fair of skin, fair of hair, in possession of large breasts and flirting with the camera. Indeed all these things indicate talents and gifts that would, if properly applied, lead to success as a porn star. I fail to see your objection to the initial observation.

Is it that number 15 that freaks you out? Would you have had such a reaction if the post had been titled "19yo annie"?
( Ratsta, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:19, archived)

What talent? Photos do not show talent.
Are you another idiot american?
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:23, archived)

Again with the personal insults...
Do you not have any valid challenges to the argument?
( Ratsta, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:24, archived)

Plenty, but you and Jenk seem incapable of comprehending even basic concepts.
www.b3ta.com/talk/5483894

I'm not the one losing my temper. Jenk was apparently upset by something you later used to try and support his argument. You're both completely retarded.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:28, archived)

an insult for an insult.
You implied I was/am a paedo by the very same comment you've linked, so I called you a cunt.
( Jenk Neptune is a pedant and now I can't fit my sig in, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:32, archived)

You are a bit of a creepy nonce, to be fair.

( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:35, archived)

OK, well if you'd like to continue the chat without throwing around insult, I'm happy to chat.
But I assure you that I'm not retarded and my nationality is irrelevant to the discussion.

As it happens, yes I do consider it "ok (to appreciate a woman's beauty) if they have pubes". To repeat however, this does not mean that I would ever touch a girl under the age of consent, nor would I solicit nor seek pornographic images of girls under the age of consent. Thus I am not a nonce any more than appreciating the Mona Lisa makes me an art thief because I view it without taking it home.

May I assume that you do not consider this OK? That would appear to be the drive behind your comments. You have not made any specific replies to my observations of sexual mores over history nor have you answer my question regarding the title of the OP.
( Ratsta, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:37, archived)

www.b3ta.com/talk/5484001
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:39, archived)

Your facility with argument is eclipsed only by the creativity of your insults.
Good day, Sir.
( Ratsta, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:46, archived)

And you butt in halfway with irrelevant nonsense about how you wish
you could share the love with younger girls. Best if you fuck off to /board where you belong.
( Dave Trouser ; the people's choice - 75% agree, Sat 27 Sep 2008, 6:58, archived)