b3ta.com talk
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Talk » Message 5784269 (Thread)

Well it's not
I don't see why it deserves coverage. The father wasn't abusive, there was no failing by social services, etc. This is a private matter and should be treated as such.
(, Mon 29 Dec 2008, 13:58, archived)
Don't get me wrong, my sympathies go out to the family
but if we heard of every death like this...?
(, Mon 29 Dec 2008, 13:59, archived)
I don't disagree
but it wouldn't be my first reaction
(, Mon 29 Dec 2008, 14:00, archived)
I never said it was my first reaction
but it wasn't very long before I thought that.
(, Mon 29 Dec 2008, 14:01, archived)
Oh DAMN that father not being abusive
I mean I was interested but then it turned out she had a happy life I was all 'what is this shit? Where's the beatings? Where's the years of abuse?' NONSENSE.
(, Mon 29 Dec 2008, 14:03, archived)
The whole baby P thing should have got coverage
(but not as much as it did) because there was a public interest. A public service had failed in its duty, and as tax payers we need to know this.

But a telly being dropped by accident, it's just news for the sake of news.
(, Mon 29 Dec 2008, 14:05, archived)