
more money is justified because some other leaders will get money for public services?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:47, archived)

I am saying less people will die and Africans will have a chance at a better life.
So you'd rather let those with good intent starve as well as those under Mugabe?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:49, archived)

has to come from Africa itself.
The West can't really do much, aside from changing the trade laws to make it fairer and the basic humanitarian aid to the worst-affected parts.
Throwing cheques at the problem isn't going to make it go away, and all Live8 will do is boost the reputation of pop stars and make middle-class students feel good about themselves.
But that doesn't mean that you're not a cunt.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:54, archived)

Fifi Trixibelle deserves hideous body mutilation and arsecunting with a large hammer.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:00, archived)

deserve to be bombed? Hope you were nice to Dekazer last time you spoke to her.
There are b3tans on the Edinburgh march.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:01, archived)

And then they start to run up more debt... cancel that again?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:08, archived)

But it's not throwing cheques at it.
If you cancel the debt (which isn't done without strict conditions on where that money goes) then the country can start building it's infrastructures again, investing etc.
Some people talking about Africa as if it's one country with one president! It's not.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 10:59, archived)

Its not like the leaders are going to say 'Golly now we've got no debt we should really change our corrupt genocidal ways' is it...
edit: news.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2005/06/25/wnig25.xml
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:04, archived)

but that doesn't mean that we shouldn't help those countries with diplomatic governments whose people are suffering because of debt and unfair trade laws.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:08, archived)

But we would be giving money to all of them, even the corrupt ones
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:10, archived)

Without taking the imperialist attitude that they can only be helped by us and not themselves
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:16, archived)

but is there any reason why we can't only give money to countries with stable democratic governments?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:12, archived)

There would be a systematic plan of structured debt relief requiring the meeting of strict conditions.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:13, archived)

Tell me now, which particular bit of aid ever given to Africa went in its entirety where it was supposed to and not to line the pockets of officials?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:15, archived)

in Nigeria. They both have digital satellite and a 1mb web connection.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:15, archived)

the two people in Africa that you know are wealthy, there is no poverty and no need for aid or any kind of western intervention?
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:17, archived)

you lefties bang on about it, you'd swear they were still living in tribes.
( , Sat 2 Jul 2005, 11:24, archived)