it's not even just the strengthcitric acid is pretty useless at dissolving minerals. Being organic and that. So does more or less bugger all to teeth.
(
the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 19 May 2009, 14:05,
archived)
No.Citric acid is the most erosive acid found in soft drinks and is the predominant acid in non-cola drinks
(
Mu Dinofiddler, Tue 19 May 2009, 14:09,
archived)
"The erosive potential of colas is 10 times that of fruit juices in just the first three minutes of drinking, a study last year showed"it seems to contradict itself.
(
Moon Girl Technologies horrendous beanbag, Tue 19 May 2009, 14:16,
archived)
Yeah, I just actually read the thing after ctrl f-ing for citric acid.(
Mu Dinofiddler, Tue 19 May 2009, 14:19,
archived)
I think it's trying to slate non-cola fizzy drinks -sprite and that kind of thing that don't contain phosphoric acid but do have citric acid added as a flavour enhancer - for being bad for teeth. I don't think it's suggesting natural fruit juices are bad for teeth. But they've got confused with the scientific reasoning behind the actual results and applied their own primary school chemistry logic
(
the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 19 May 2009, 14:28,
archived)
that's the press completely misunderstading the scientific dataI'd suggest reading the original paper.
that "citric acid" statement is based on pH, not the power to erode enamel. If you notice, they point out that cola removes about 5% of enamel wheras other drinks were closer to 1.5%
ie, less erosive. Shit journalism. Citric acid may well have a lower pH than phosphoric acid. That makes fuck all difference to what happens to calcium salts (the most important bit of enamel) upon exposure.
Give I use phosphoric acid to strip limescale (calcium salt) from the inside of stainless steel fermenters, I think it's probably more harmful to teeth than a bit of orange juice, really.
(
the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Tue 19 May 2009, 14:17,
archived)