I'm taking issue with saying something that's gone is not gone because it's still where it was in the past at that point in time.
Whereas it's gone, by the definition of "gone", so if that gone-ness is upsetting or disquieting to someone, you don't change anything about its gone-ness or their affect, you just dangle shiny sophistry to distract them. Which may have been your aim, but I suspect not.
(, Tue 9 Jun 2009, 22:26, archived)