I'm only proposing a compromise solution that will cool better than no cooling, but without draining engine power or significantly increasing the weight of the vehicle.
It would also work while your car was sat with the engine off.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 19:36, archived)
Maybe in some shitheap old commy car, just maybe.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 19:38, archived)
that's what I weigh! Still unnecessary, though. I'm perfectly capable of using a handle.
How about your car's windows make from infra-red transmitting glass? It wouldn't trap the heat so much, then. And use a heat-conductive roof lining.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 19:42, archived)
Also, your latest suggestion would make the car an icebox in winter.
The solution is, air con. As proven by the millions of cars with it installed.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 19:44, archived)
especially in this day and age when mpg is more important than ever. The popularity of the idea isn't proof of how good it is. It's a luxury feature, and luxuries sell, because people like luxuries.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 19:47, archived)
You could only hope to get to ambient, and even then, very slowly. They'd be even less effective with the car stationary.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 19:40, archived)
ambient temperature is better than greenhouse temperature.
(, Thu 11 Jun 2009, 19:42, archived)