data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
as opposed to the "smug" writing.
Does a comic really have to be well drawn to be a comic? So can it have pretty pictures but shit writing and still be called a comic?
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:48, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
the difference is being regarded as a good comic
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:49, archived)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/277f8/277f86e59dcd9b7e049850fa450a6ba38bdde3db" alt="This is a normal post"
a comic with good writing can be really let down by bad art, and the reverse is true also
although in the crazy world of webcomics i don't think it matters too much either way, people will still praise you unequivocally no matter what turds you plop out
( , Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:53, archived)