no it doesn't
the review was written by someone with an IQ less than that of a golden retriever.

The major approach of the review is that it's rubbish because a)the drawing is poor (moot point, the author has never claimed points for drawing skills) and b)it's rubbish because if you understand the maths or the science you suffer from aspergers (which is a rather childish thing to think, really).

It's basically retard bully level "hate what you don't understand"

If you don't get the science, you might not find it funny. That's fine. But only a terminally self-obssessed idiot assumes that because they don't understand it, it might not be funny to those that do.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:54, archived)

i understand most of the jokes and i think laughing about statistical data and the fibonacci squence is borderline autism
does that make me a bully?
( Lightguy hail satan, Mon 6 Jul 2009, 14:59, archived)

i'd say that it makes you someone who doesn't really understand autism

( manolith hooray for me, Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:06, archived)

no, it makes you a bit of an idiot.
how on earth can the subject matter of comedy be defined as autistic?

you don't find it funny. Cool. But that doesn't mean it isn't to others. Even though this is the internet, and this may come as a shock to you, yours isn't the only valid opinion out there.

People find humour in whatever they want. and those that work with that kind of maths or science day in, day out, are likely to find humour in it. It's no more or less "autistic" than finding humour in any work-related subject.
( the mighty badger Aphrodite, on a bar stool, by your side, Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:06, archived)

i don't think you understand the meaning of the word "hyperbole"
and i'm sorry, but it is still intensely nerdy to find fourier transforms and poisson distributions funny, no matter what you say
( Lightguy hail satan, Mon 6 Jul 2009, 15:23, archived)