
but you forgot to mention that the primary function of breasts is maternal and one of nurturing children. many children have had glimpses of my naked breasts in public - as I feed my babies. I don't have any problem with my kids seeing the natural human body (though obviously only in a "safe" context).
'ning folks
( , Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:20, archived)

I'm just back from the pub (I left early, I'm such a lightweight) where I was showing off my new bra to Dekazer and we (Dekazer, Mighty Badger, Teviot Moose, Dekazer's flatmate) had a long conversation about nipple clamps
( , Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:24, archived)

indeed maternal, but their presentation as large globes is a sexual display, according to Desmond Morris. And I agree with your second point entirely, but would like to add that it seems to me that television or film counts as a pretty safe context, as characters can not yet leap out of the screen and grab infants from their seats. However, I'm interested in your use of the word "natural" - would you intentionally "protect" your children from the sight of someone with piercings, for example?]#
And also, 'ning to you too.
( , Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:24, archived)

I mean "naked in a non-sexual sense" - I don't think it's appropriate to expose my kids to sexual nudity at their ages, nor for another ten years at least. I don't have a problem with piercings and the like
( , Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:26, archived)

we walk around the house naked, the kids often share baths/showers with us. the exception is Mr V covers up first thing in the morning.
( , Tue 12 Jul 2005, 0:30, archived)