my uni trialed some software that checked that sort of thing
the test found that 30% of all papers handed in had some kind of uncited material, then they tested it at one of the Oxford colleges down the road and found that 75% had some sort of plagiarism.

conclusion = bloody students
( chuff monkey I AM him, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 20:55, archived)

Citation needed.

( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 20:56, archived)

shitcunts

( mongychops, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 20:58, archived)

fine
I actually remembered the software with the dig about students Here
( chuff monkey I AM him, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 20:59, archived)

That's so badly disguised.
I remember actually some study someone did on some people about some website and they found that 25% or something clicked things. They went and did it somewhere it's cool to dislike and discovered that more than 25% of people clicked things.
( mike woz ere 7442200 & 7696970 getter, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 21:01, archived)

that makes no sense
you are nonsense
get out of my head
( chuff monkey I AM him, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 21:04, archived)

This is the best thing since Rumsfeld's 'known unknowns' quotation.

( Druid, Tue 12 Jan 2010, 21:06, archived)