Be what? In contempt? You'll have to do better than that dangling sentence, mate.
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 9:54, Reply)
b3ta.com/talk/5807993
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 10:24, Reply)
I don't have a time machine, but I can tell you 2009 WHARRGARBL that their taste is a crime scene and hope the message travels backwards through sheer embarrassment.
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 10:24, Reply)
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 10:25, Reply)
DEAR INTERNET USER. POSTING JOKES ABOUT A DEFENDANT FACING RAPE CHARGES IS NOT A LEGAL RISK TO YOU; IT IS A MORAL ONE. THE LAW PERMITS IT. BASIC HUMAN DECENCY DOES NOT.
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 10:26, Reply)
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 10:36, Reply)
IN ENGLISH LAW A PERSON IS PRESUMED INNOCENT UNTIL CONVICTED BY A COMPETENT COURT. THE PHRASE "DEFINITELY A RAPIST" IS A SUBMISSION OF OPINION DRESSED AS FACT AND IS NOT ADMISSIBLE AS INTERNET EVIDENCE. PLEASE STATE WHETHER A CONVICTION HAS BEEN RECORDED OR WHETHER THIS IS MERELY THE SORT OF THING ONE SAYS AFTER THREE PINTS
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 10:36, Reply)
THE QUALITY OF HIS COMEDY IS IRRELEVANT TO THE ISSUE OF CONTEMPT OF COURT.
PUBLICATIONS WHICH CREATE A SUBSTANTIAL RISK OF SERIOUS PREJUDICE TO ACTIVE PROCEEDINGS MAY AMOUNT TO CONTEMPT.
PLEASE CONFIRM WHETHER THE TRIAL HAS CONCLUDED.
(, Tue 13 Oct 2026, 10:48, Reply)