
Although, if you're going to say it correctly, it's hanged...
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:31,
archived)

if they would just ban members from having outside business interests and have a five-year waiting period before they take any job in a related private sector after standing down. While it wouldn't stop the petty theiving, it would sort out some of the vested interests.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:34,
archived)

A blend of the best politicians would be better than one body with a certain agenda.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:33,
archived)

The ones who are good at it got us into this mess.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:35,
archived)

with only 5% of the polyunsaturates of the Republican Party.
/don't know where I was going with that.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:36,
archived)
/don't know where I was going with that.

lying thieves. I have one vote and it will be against the incumbent.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:32,
archived)

..hmm..
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:35,
archived)

( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:35,
archived)

But does he REALLY know what he is doing?
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:37,
archived)

I really don't believe the crap that some people come out with about how everyone will leave if we put the taxes up too much.
And even if they do, fine, it's not like the banking sector could do much of a worse job than they have recently.
Exactly how many hours a day do you have to work before you're genuinely worth millions of pounds a year?
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:40,
archived)
And even if they do, fine, it's not like the banking sector could do much of a worse job than they have recently.
Exactly how many hours a day do you have to work before you're genuinely worth millions of pounds a year?

It's late, you should be in bed. Stop rambling on with your half-baked political ideas.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:42,
archived)

The "credit crunch" (I hate that phrase).. kicked us squarely in the nuts. Once this bloody election is out of the way, hopefully the housing market will pick up again.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 3:56,
archived)

well, they probably deserve your support. Unless they don't.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 5:07,
archived)

they will be less creative. Rich people are people too, and they're people who've managed to persuade others to give them large amounts of money, which in many cases means they've pleased other people a great deal. Taking their money away and spending it on things they didn't intend to spend it on reduces their ability to please others in whatever way they do.
( ,
Sun 18 Apr 2010, 8:42,
archived)