b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10081497 (Thread)

# good ones ;P
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 22:50, archived)
# yup, some good 'uns there
wasn't claiming mine was amazing HDR, just that it doesn't look like a "photograph", ftr :0
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 22:53, archived)
#
The I cannot stop tonemapping, someone kill me quickly kind
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 22:55, archived)
#
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:02, archived)
# But it's my only line!
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:10, archived)
# But seriously
overworked monstrosities that they are, that stuff sells.

You made a few of those at some point I guess, it's rough work making it look half natural. It's like a tabloid of all headlines, each part of the pic screaming SEE ME SEE ME.
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:17, archived)
# While some of those are nice
HDR to me should be like trying to get as close as you can to reality.
Or even hyper realism.

Most of those don't look real at all.

To each his own, of course.
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 22:57, archived)
# Well, although the human eye is capable of perceiving a wide dynamic range at one time
a true HDR photo of a true HDR subject is capable of displaying a greater range. By definition then it could never look natural; it's a completely unnatural view of the world from the human point of view.
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:01, archived)
# christ
they're horrible
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 22:59, archived)
# I updated my site for you.
And you said NOTHING.
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:02, archived)
# to you.
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:04, archived)
# oh god micto please reply "to me"
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:07, archived)
# to me
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:10, archived)
# yay :)

now jump through hoops
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:13, archived)
# Colin McRae wiv de angles:(
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:04, archived)
# up 50..left 20..trees
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:06, archived)
# they're fucking awful
apart from the first two
(, Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:17, archived)