
wasn't claiming mine was amazing HDR, just that it doesn't look like a "photograph", ftr :0
( ,
Mon 7 Jun 2010, 22:53,
archived)

overworked monstrosities that they are, that stuff sells.
You made a few of those at some point I guess, it's rough work making it look half natural. It's like a tabloid of all headlines, each part of the pic screaming SEE ME SEE ME.
( ,
Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:17,
archived)
You made a few of those at some point I guess, it's rough work making it look half natural. It's like a tabloid of all headlines, each part of the pic screaming SEE ME SEE ME.

HDR to me should be like trying to get as close as you can to reality.
Or even hyper realism.
Most of those don't look real at all.
To each his own, of course.
( ,
Mon 7 Jun 2010, 22:57,
archived)
Or even hyper realism.
Most of those don't look real at all.
To each his own, of course.

a true HDR photo of a true HDR subject is capable of displaying a greater range. By definition then it could never look natural; it's a completely unnatural view of the world from the human point of view.
( ,
Mon 7 Jun 2010, 23:01,
archived)