
base an ambiguous campaign on how environmentally friendly they are, though.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:44,
archived)

a lot of businesses are doing it despite it being a miniscule percentage of their expenditure. It makes people feel like little heroes, saving the earth by using a life-long shopping bag or whatnot.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:49,
archived)

"environmentally friendly web agency" advertised. They say they are environmentally friendly because they won't travel to meet the clients, which is a great excuse.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:55,
archived)

I just didn't think of a good enough excuse.
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 12:01,
archived)

Others, like EDF, just use it as a cover up for their more nefarious activities.
What isn't made clear in EDF's blurb is that whether you agree with nuclear power or not, sister company EDF Trading is still one of the world's largest exporters of coal, the most pollutant fossil fuel used in power stations. EDF have a hell of a lot to answer for...
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 12:04,
archived)
What isn't made clear in EDF's blurb is that whether you agree with nuclear power or not, sister company EDF Trading is still one of the world's largest exporters of coal, the most pollutant fossil fuel used in power stations. EDF have a hell of a lot to answer for...

which is rather a lot in today's day and age, especially for a "green" company. 66% nuclear too, which ought to be a bit higher really. It remains to be seen, but they are apparently developing renewables, so they may not be too bad in the long run, assuming of course, they mean what they say
( ,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 12:49,
archived)