![[challenge entry]](/images/board_posticon_c.gif "Challenge Entry: Mock Green Britain Day"){kind=small}
Innovations
From the Mock Green Britain Day challenge. See all 141 entries (closed)
(
monkeon schmonkeon,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:36,
archived)
goddammit no one else really stands a chance with you around.Brilliant as ever!
(
Damien's Hearse,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:39,
archived)
yeah, but no-one'd bother looking at a website but no-one'd bother looking at a websitepopulated with your and my pics . . .
(
Sir Aunty Grampa Dave the Hat - enjoying a post-meridian muncheon - Ta! Cannaoogim!?,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:42,
archived)
haha greatbut, don't the vast majority of businesses put profit ahead of environment, just to varying degrees?
I think I'm confused... so in the last frame, because the towel isn't green, does that mean she's not bullshitting, or is bullshitting? I'm so confused today. So confused.
(I think I'm confused... so in the last frame, because the towel isn't green, does that mean she's not bullshitting, or is bullshitting? I'm so confused today. So confused.
drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:41,
archived)
They don't tend to thenbase an ambiguous campaign on how environmentally friendly they are, though.
( monkeon schmonkeon,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:44,
archived)
It's the fashiona lot of businesses are doing it despite it being a miniscule percentage of their expenditure. It makes people feel like little heroes, saving the earth by using a life-long shopping bag or whatnot.
( drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:49,
archived)
I have seen an"environmentally friendly web agency" advertised. They say they are environmentally friendly because they won't travel to meet the clients, which is a great excuse.
( monkeon schmonkeon,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:55,
archived)
pfftsounds like something from Nathan Barley
( drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:58,
archived)
Dammit, I had the idea of sitting at my desk in my underpants talking to clients years ago.I just didn't think of a good enough excuse.
(
mofaha ┐( ˘_˘)┌ ʅ(́◡◝)ʃ,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 12:01,
archived)
I do think some companies are actually serious about the whole thing, as they see it as a way of protecting their future interests.Others, like EDF, just use it as a cover up for their more nefarious activities.
What isn't made clear in EDF's blurb is that whether you agree with nuclear power or not, sister company EDF Trading is still one of the world's largest exporters of coal, the most pollutant fossil fuel used in power stations. EDF have a hell of a lot to answer for...
(What isn't made clear in EDF's blurb is that whether you agree with nuclear power or not, sister company EDF Trading is still one of the world's largest exporters of coal, the most pollutant fossil fuel used in power stations. EDF have a hell of a lot to answer for...
Damien's Hearse,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 12:04,
archived)
EDF Energy production is also around 28% for coalwhich is rather a lot in today's day and age, especially for a "green" company. 66% nuclear too, which ought to be a bit higher really. It remains to be seen, but they are apparently developing renewables, so they may not be too bad in the long run, assuming of course, they mean what they say
( drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 12:49,
archived)
argh!I've buggered up the last frame, haven't I?
*goes to change it*
(*goes to change it*
monkeon schmonkeon,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:48,
archived)
hahaI was expecting the flag to go green, but I see what you've done
( drbroon abloooobloobloo,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:54,
archived)
Smashing! Sir Aunty Grampa Dave the Hat - enjoying a post-meridian muncheon - Ta! Cannaoogim!?,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:42,
archived)
outstanding :D theoriginalsteve <this space intentionally left blank>,
Fri 18 Jun 2010, 11:57,
archived)