b3ta.com board
You are not logged in. Login or Signup
Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10470093 (Thread)

# nicely
would be great if this could be their downfall, though I suspect that David Cameron's cosy relationship with Brooks might save them all.
(, Tue 5 Jul 2011, 23:46, archived)
# remember how we (as a b3ta collective) managed to get the words "is an idiot" associated with "Julie Moult" forevermore on the internet
can we do something similar with this shower of bastards?
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:11, archived)
# I hope so.
*signs up*
We'd have to agree on a common phrase and use it over and over and over again.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:14, archived)
# Murdoch, Brooks and Co.: An absolute shower of bastards
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:19, archived)
# I wonder if we could get away with a b3ta compo...
...but I suppose they have better lawyers than the likes of Richard Branson & Prince ;)
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:21, archived)
# They can make threats.
At which point we'll have to withdraw, because we don't want to endanger b3ta.
Private Eye will naturally be on our side, though, and have some hefty reporting artillery.
But until then...
(Basically, yes, it's worth a compo IMO)
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:28, archived)
# It's worth a go
Maybe the comp could be titled something non-specific like "Shameful journalism", and a few clever subtle entries could slip through.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:33, archived)
# Shameful Journalism.
I like it! It's got a lot of potential and won't annoy The Man.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:37, archived)
# The Man loves shameful journalism.
But he lives in mortal terror of good journalism.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:39, archived)
# You mean honest journalism?
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:55, archived)
# Yes. Good journalism is honest.
Dishonest journalism is bad journalism.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:02, archived)
# Hateful journalism based on illegal hacking of a dead girl's phone is... well... this.
I think it would be an alright compo to be honest... and (mostly) space hopper free.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:07, archived)
# It'd be a good compo. It'd probably upset me, cos I'm a hack and would expect to have my profession traduced, misunderstood and basically given a thorough kicking.
But frankly, these vile cunts have earned it. So I'm prepared to suffer.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:15, archived)
# There's probably other journalists on here that would feel the same way.
But time will tell, whether or not this will actually be next week's compo.

We could have jumping BLUE shapes for all I know.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:21, archived)
# Yeah well I'm keeping my mouth shut about that
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 4:05, archived)
# Good thinking, DMH.
Although as a journalist, I'd probably find the whole thing so upsetting that I'd never go on the internet again.
Which may be a bonus for some!
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:37, archived)
# just thought of a good compo idea: "What if journalists couldn't lie"
or "Show us a world with completely honest journalism"
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:57, archived)
# Oh, for fuck's sake.
Look, I've been a journo for 7 years, and have never lied, and never been asked to.
I'm disgusted that my profession has been brought into disrepute, but please don't tar us all with the same brush, eh?
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:07, archived)
# I understand.
I'm sure you do some great work, so it's a shame there's the few that ruin the whole thing.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:15, archived)
# "If tabloid journalists couldn't lie"?
We'd still end up tarring a few poor sods, but overall...
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:16, archived)
# Aw, man, the large majority of hacks work on local papers doing stories about planning applications and such.
I do.
These vile filth are not typical, I promise you.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:22, archived)
# I know - hence the "tabloid" bit.
Local papers are some of the last places that do investigative journalism these days.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:24, archived)
# At last! A bit of encouragement!
Even though I'm wholly in favour of a "fuck Murdoch" image challenge, I'm cringing in advance.
I reckon I'll have to take a week off the internet, rather than exhaust myself being defensive.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:32, archived)
# Och, don't worry about a bit of stick.
I'm a scientist, Roman re-enactor and birdwatcher...
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:34, archived)
# ^This.
I take stick all the time, it's just one of those things.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:36, archived)
# Yeah, but only complete nutters'd consider any of that evil.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:57, archived)
# Oi, leave us nutters alone.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 2:28, archived)
# I do apologise to the entire nutter community.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 2:45, archived)
# hey wait a fucking minute
where did I say all journalists were liars?
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 2:09, archived)
# You didn't say all journalists are liars.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 2:26, archived)
# Rupert Murdoch makes my stomach churn
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:43, archived)
# copy, paste,repeat
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:43, archived)
# That indicates that you are healthy and sane.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:44, archived)
# I admire your medical yardstick.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:47, archived)
# hahahaha,
I'm sure you're not so bad yourself!
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 0:53, archived)
# ooooooh naughty!



/carry on
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:19, archived)
# If you insist...
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:27, archived)
# Why am I looking at a picture of your mutilated penis emerging from a baked potato ?
World's most unusual chat-up strategy.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 1:50, archived)
# hahaha,
don't worry.
It's only the starter.
(, Wed 6 Jul 2011, 2:08, archived)