Not after...
...but before the s in both ;)
Just like in Woodward's.
I must stop being a pedant - it's likely to make me very unpopular.
*sigh*
The joke is very woo though. I like the Littlejohn bit.
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:02,
archived)
Just like in Woodward's.
I must stop being a pedant - it's likely to make me very unpopular.
*sigh*
The joke is very woo though. I like the Littlejohn bit.
only in plurals
and some nouns that end in s (but this varies depending on who you ask)
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:05,
archived)
where's Dr Phil
when you need her?
Edit:It seems the legendary unicorn is more than up to the task
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:11,
archived)
Edit:It seems the legendary unicorn is more than up to the task
I should coco
there are people who bother to understand the offside rule, at least your level of knowledge has a useful purpose
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:23,
archived)
only
if the possessor ends in an s. and there's debate about whether the extra s is required then.
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:06,
archived)
clarification
if say something was mine, it would be unicorn's
if it belonged to priestess, say (first name i could think of ending in s) it would be priestess's
if it was all of ours, it would be the b3tans'
if it was one of ours, it would be the b3tan's
/grammar pedantic freak
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:09,
archived)
if it belonged to priestess, say (first name i could think of ending in s) it would be priestess's
if it was all of ours, it would be the b3tans'
if it was one of ours, it would be the b3tan's
/grammar pedantic freak
i am incredibly pedantic about grammar/spelling
i should get out more, i suppose...
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:16,
archived)
Except...
in those ANNOYING exceptions...
its
his
hers
ours
theirs
yours
mine (doesn't even have an 's')
( ,
Tue 15 Apr 2003, 21:26,
archived)
its
his
hers
ours
theirs
yours
mine (doesn't even have an 's')