it's the fade
it causes virtually every single pixel in your image to change in every single frame
( ,
Thu 12 Jan 2012, 10:52,
archived)
I would agree with this
if you didn't do the fade it would work out much smaller in file size.
( ,
Thu 12 Jan 2012, 11:12,
archived)
Thanks.
I just assumed that as I'd saved each layer as a 25k file, reassembling them would be about 350K.
Didn't realise GIFs end up much bigger!
( ,
Thu 12 Jan 2012, 11:23,
archived)
Didn't realise GIFs end up much bigger!
It's not about each frame but the blending between frames the more pixels that constantly change
the heavier the filesize I can't remember the name of the b3tard but he does those silhouette animations which have a massive canvas size but are extremely small on filesize because the only moving parts are the silhouettes which are usually smaller on the canvas this is a prime example of gif optimisation.
( ,
Thu 12 Jan 2012, 11:27,
archived)