b3ta.com board

Home » Messageboard » XXX » Message 10769657 (Thread)

vote 'heaven', it's the only way to be sure, to be sure

(

Ham o' Shatner -.-- --- ..- .-. / .- .-.. .-.. / --. .- -.--, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:18, archived)

I already did!

I must addmit I hardly ever vote,and tent to leave it to the majority, but I just so don't understand the Necronomicon Apocrypha one, I voted for the one with the highest votes so far, even though I would have prefered cats and dogs or cops, but that would have just wasted a vote...

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:25, archived)

^ this is pretty much my way of thinking

(

Ham o' Shatner -.-- --- ..- .-. / .- .-.. .-.. / --. .- -.--, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:29, archived)

So instead of taking the chance to embrace something new, you deliberately voted against it because you "don't understand"?

Hurrah! Another win for close-mindedness! \o/

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:42, archived)

Clutches handbag......

I'M ALLOWED A FUCKING VOTE AND ALLOWED TO VOTE FOR WHAT I LIKE NO MATTER WHAT THE FUCKING REASON IS......!
And plus it looks like I was in the majority.....

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:45, archived)

No, the majority voted against heaven.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:47, archived)

And even more voted against Necronomicon Apocrypha didn't they?

I you want to draw a monster Mu, just draw one..

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:49, archived)

Even more is not a majority.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:51, archived)

Did I say (even more) was?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:53, archived)

Seeing as the topic of the previous two posts was the majority, then yes, it was implicit.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:59, archived)

I implied absolutly no such thing at all, and certainly didn't mean that, after you pointed out my initial error in using it

I asked you a direct question which was (And even more voted against Necronomicon Apocrypha didn't they?) which you have still not answered I will point out. are you deliberately trying to change the sunject of the orignall discustion?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:11, archived)

You already did that when you tried to hide behind a fictional majority. Yes, even more voted against the Necronomicon, because they wanted one of the others. Which is fine.

The original subject of this subthread was you deliberately picking one you didn't want in order to ensure the Necronomicon definitely didn't go through. The subject was of you making a bit of a dick move.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:24, archived)

Shall we keep discussing the subject?

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:25, archived)

I'v got all night cutey pie ;-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:39, archived)

Mabe they were asking themselfs?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:49, archived)

Yes probably...

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:50, archived)

I Didn't vote for one I didn't want. and nowhere did I say i did, did I?

I voted for one I wanted more than Necronomicon, Didn't I?
I'm allowed to do that aren't I?
I would have prefered cats and dogs or cops, But I have already stated why I didn't vote for that haven't I?
So is voting for something you prefere over something you don't a dick move now?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:38, archived)

So, yes you stated why you didn't vote for it. Because it had the highest votes. So yes. Dick move.

edit: I've edited in the important part of that quote. You clearly state you voted for the highest one, because you didn't understand the Necronomicon.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:49, archived)

Copied and pasted from above

I voted for one I wanted more than Necronomicon, Didn't I?
So is voting for something you prefere over something you don't a dick move now?
Please explain why voting for your prefered option is a dick move plaees?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:52, archived)

See edit.

And stop calling it your prefered option when your own statement says otherwise.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 22:54, archived)

I'll call it my prefered option if that is what it was....

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:08, archived)

Which of course it wasn't as your preferred option was cats, dogs or police.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:22, archived)

It was my prefered option over Necronomicon though.

So therefore you are wrong ;-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:27, archived)

Error. Just because you prefered it over the Necronomicon does not make it the option you prefered overall.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:49, archived)

Never said it did did I?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:57, archived)

Yes. I'd explain, but it appears you wouldn't understand.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:58, archived)

Just copy and paste the bit where I said "Overall"

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:02, archived)

Which is not how the English language works.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:04, archived)

Can you clarify that for me please?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:10, archived)

I'll give you a hint. Go have a think about the word prefer.

The word overall doesn't need to be used, because it's within the definiton of the word prefer. If there's four options, and you rank them in the order you prefer then the one you rank at #3 IS NOT THE ONE YOU PREFER JUST BECAUSE YOU RANK IT ABOVE #4. Your prefered option was #1.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:17, archived)

You used the word overall.

And I'v already explained my preferences..

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:22, archived)

I used it to clarify the meaning of the word prefer.

And yes, those preferences are the same ones that prove that you're a bit of a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:24, archived)

Doesn't seem like that to me on rereading what you wrote..

But hey, you have the last word on the subject..

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:27, archived)

I did say you wouldn't understand. Oh look I was right.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:29, archived)

Copied and pasted from your post

"but I just so don't understand the Necronomicon Apocrypha one I voted for the one with the highest votes so far, even though I would have prefered cats and dogs or cops, but that would have just wasted a vote..."
I did clearly state that "but I just so don't understand the Necronomicon Apocrypha one" I then went on to say "I voted for the one with the highest votes so far" Nowhere did I say I voted for the highest one BECAUSE I didn't understand did I ? show me where?
It appears you're reading whatever you want to and just making stuff up to suit yourself, If you can't put your point accross in a logical manner while sticking to plain facks and without just making things up i'm off....

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:06, archived)

Oh, we'll do this shit clause by clause.

You say the reason for you voting at all was that you didn't understand the Necronomicon one.

You then say you voted for the highest voted one, even though they're not the ones you would have prefered.

The words "I just so didn't understand" link the two clauses together in the way that explicitly enforces a causal link. You did one because of the other. Welcome to the english language. I'll thank you for not trying to call me illogical for following the standard interpretation of your own syntax.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:14, archived)

Now I've explained the basic grammar of your own sentence I take this opportunity to reaffirm that it was a dick move.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:20, archived)

Talking to yourself is a sign of maddness you know...

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:29, archived)

I'm not going over the same ground.....

It's just quite clear you're as incapable of understanding as you are of answering the questions that I have asked you that you just keep ignoring.
So I'll just let you have the last word :-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:26, archived)

I just fucking answered your questions. I've just told you, in plain english WHY your statement says you voted for heaven because you didn't like the necronomicon.

I have shown you where you say it's "because", it's the clause "I just so don't understand". You haven't put up any sort of coherent argument against this. Just saying I haven't explained it DOESN'T MAKE IT TRUE. I've explained it. Twice. I've answered the questions you say I'm ignoring. Twice. Shall I say it again? THE QUESTION HAS BEEN ANSWERED. TWICE.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:36, archived)

You're bonkers and incoherent and just make stuff up.

Like I said I'll let you have the last word :-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:41, archived)

What part of my answer was incoherent? Which part have I made up?

It's not my fault you said something which proves you're a dick. It's not my fault you don't understand how clearly you've shown it.

Again you're attacking my character with nothing to back yourself up with.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:43, archived)

Someone has shown it.....

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:51, archived)

Make more sense little train.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:54, archived)

Why? you're not :-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:57, archived)

I'm making perfect sense. I think I've deciphered the "Someone has shown it..."

The "it" in the message you were replying to was "you're a dick", this statement refering to you, that is the invisable man.

This makes the sentence read as "Some has shown that [the invisable man] is a dick..." which, I'm sure, was not your intention.

You meant a more open "Someone has shown that they're a dick...".
Which would have implied that I [Mu], was being a dick.

You're really not very good at this English thing, are you? I'm having to fix your insults for you.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:04, archived)

I just generaly meant someone...

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:09, archived)

Oh in which case you definitely need to make more sense little train.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:19, archived)

Also: trying to invalidate my argument by abitrarily saying I'm "imcapable" without any way of backing this up? That's a bit of a dick move.

You're just a bit of a dick really.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:41, archived)

I think reading down the thread proves your incapability to understand what has been written and asked and ignored

Like I said though, you have the last word on the subject :-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:48, archived)

You're repeating yourself without taking into account what I've actually said.

I've answered your questions. You're being willfully blind. You really are a bit of a cockend.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:51, archived)

I'v no need to take into acount anything you have actually said...

being as I lost interest in it half an hour ago ;-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:55, archived)

So yeah. Bit of a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 23:59, archived)

Why?

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:02, archived)

Well the most apparent one at this moment is you, right now, asking me to reiterate a point I've made about a dozen times.

You see, I back myself up when I call you a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:07, archived)

Nice to see you do it so enthusiasticly too ;-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:11, archived)

I knew I should have got a flounce image ready.

(

FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector., Thu 17 May 2012, 0:12, archived)

I'm Just help Mu troll along..... ;-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:15, archived)

Of course you are deary. Backed into a corner by your own ignorance you pull the "bail" chute.

*slow handclap applause*

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:18, archived)

You just seem to need to unendingly rant....

So I thought I'd oblige...

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:25, archived)

You seem to think that this in some way removes from the fact you're a bit of a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:29, archived)

Carry on...

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:32, archived)

If you insist.

You make a dick move in the poll.
You try to deny your own reasons for doing so.
You try to make your own sentence mean something differrent.
You make baseless assertions that I'm imcoherent.
Once you realise you're backed into a corner you try and assert you were "helping me troll along" or some shit.

Frankly, you're a bit of a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:37, archived)

You carry on if you want, I'm going to bed..

it's been fun ;-)

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:41, archived)

I'm glad you enjoyed it. You're still an irreversible cockend.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:43, archived)

Also, in case you haven't got this bit yet, I'm not trolling you.

You are genuinely and have proven yourself to be, a bit of a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:22, archived)

Let out the anger..

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:28, archived)

What anger would that be? I'm more pitying your inability to follow a simple argument or put together any form of coherent reply.

That and you keep trying to assert that my accusation of you being a bit of a dick is flawed.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:31, archived)

I don't gereraly bother with coherant replies to someone that is just trolling

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:38, archived)

I'm not trolling. I'm genuinely concerned that you can't see that you're a bit of a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:41, archived)

I'm not sure who you're refering to. It'll take more than this bit of dick being willfully ignorant of his own status as a bit of a dick and generally carrying on being a bit of dick to make me flounce; the bit of a dick

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:21, archived)

Needs more caps lock

(

FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector., Thu 17 May 2012, 0:24, archived)

Aw man shall I? I could decend into a screaming mess and then delete the whole thread.

It's not as if I haven't adequately proven that he's a bit a dick.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Thu 17 May 2012, 0:26, archived)

I think the moment has gone....

(

FeralCatMan Unusual disease collector., Thu 17 May 2012, 0:43, archived)

Also, that is exactly the reason why democracy doesn't work.

(

Mu Dinofiddler, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:48, archived)

Just draw a monster and stick it heaven, simples...

(The invisable man Is having a long lazy soak in search, Wed 16 May 2012, 21:51, archived)