
these are just old images I post all the time...
why should someone have to wait for someone else to post something before posting again?
it's not like he posted straight after, it was 15 WHOLE MINUTES!
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2012, 14:39,
archived)
why should someone have to wait for someone else to post something before posting again?
it's not like he posted straight after, it was 15 WHOLE MINUTES!

why post in a new thread when your thread is still at the top of the page, just post it as a reply to your own like you did with your cat images.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2012, 14:45,
archived)

EDIT: like I said... it's better than the constant rehashing of utterly wanktastic bang-wagons that just won't die!
and if you're going to bitch about somebody posting two decent images in new threads, I propose telling people point blank when they've posted something that's utter toilet
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2012, 14:47,
archived)
and if you're going to bitch about somebody posting two decent images in new threads, I propose telling people point blank when they've posted something that's utter toilet

I offered some friendly advice about avoiding multiple posts in case he did it again when it was busy and some people started swearing at him.
It's not like I deleted his thread and banned him.
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2012, 14:54,
archived)
It's not like I deleted his thread and banned him.

you threatened to have him on out the back of McDonalds, then bum him to death!
inexcusable!
( ,
Wed 6 Jun 2012, 14:58,
archived)
inexcusable!