
( ,
Sat 14 Jul 2012, 10:07,
archived)

you look at a bunch of colors and shapes and say its a field of wheat, slippers, bat and whatnot
( ,
Sat 14 Jul 2012, 10:29,
archived)

But if you see Elvis on a slice of toast, it doesn't become Elvis, it's still a slice of toast, albeit one where the visage of The King is apparent to you/others. This is pareidolia.
Seeing a field of wheat is just seeing a field of wheat and knowing it for what it is. This is called recognition.
Try it this way - what do you see?
2.bp.blogspot.com/-0gs7nQrdxEE/TZko79CWJ3I/AAAAAAAAAf4/ZOh0U8MjQIA/s1600/Wheat+Field.jpg
And now?
www.msss.com/education/happy_face/smile.gif
One picture is pure recognition - I see no faces, no sleeping monkeys, no reaching hands. I see wheat in a field. The possibility for pareidolia is there, but it would take a high level of concentration to look for something that is not instantly obvious to all. And where you might see a face, I (and many others) may not.
The other is 100% pareidolia
( ,
Sat 14 Jul 2012, 11:52,
archived)
Seeing a field of wheat is just seeing a field of wheat and knowing it for what it is. This is called recognition.
Try it this way - what do you see?
2.bp.blogspot.com/-0gs7nQrdxEE/TZko79CWJ3I/AAAAAAAAAf4/ZOh0U8MjQIA/s1600/Wheat+Field.jpg
And now?
www.msss.com/education/happy_face/smile.gif
One picture is pure recognition - I see no faces, no sleeping monkeys, no reaching hands. I see wheat in a field. The possibility for pareidolia is there, but it would take a high level of concentration to look for something that is not instantly obvious to all. And where you might see a face, I (and many others) may not.
The other is 100% pareidolia