Ok, maybe not surprise but the fact that you are annoyed that a pap has photographed a naked 'sleb.
(
addickted has attained freedom,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:34,
archived)
I'm not annoyed at the photo (although as I say above, the fact there's a market for this shite bothers me)I just think it shouldn't be dismissed on the grounds that the photos aren't very good.
(,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:36,
archived)
equally, it shouldn't be dismissed on the grounds that they have a fuckton of money
Given all the attention that was paid to her sisters arse when Will and Kate got married,it's a bit duplicitous of the papers to get all steamed about this. If they were being consistent they'd be going on about how good/bad they are, not the fact a picture has been taken of them.
(
Smallbrainfield,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:43,
archived)
hahahahatomorrows Sun front page
EXCLUSIVE, KATE'S TITS, OUR OFFICIAL JUDGEMENT
(EXCLUSIVE, KATE'S TITS, OUR OFFICIAL JUDGEMENT
HappyToast Groat froth,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 11:52,
archived)
The Mirror would be asking if we were getting value for moneyout of Kate's tits. As taxpayers we have a right to see them.
( Smallbrainfield,
Fri 14 Sep 2012, 12:01,
archived)
