Your first picture condemns Jimmy Savile.Your second picture would probably please him immensely.
Inconsistencies need to be addressed.
(Inconsistencies need to be addressed.
Captain Howdy,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 13:55,
archived)
Yeah I'm pretty sure Gary Glitters defence was that he didn't know they were underage
(
Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:04,
archived)
To be fair some of those Vietnamese 13 year old girlsare easily mistaken for MILFS. But to balance it out, only those deprived of the gift of sight.
(
Captn Hood-Butter is not dead yet.,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:42,
archived)
You think fictional child porn is acceptable. We don't.
Your usual trick of bait and debate is tolerated by most, but a statement like that leaves no room for manoeuvre.
If you're still here by the end of the weekend, I'd be both surprised and disappointed in b3ta.
(Your usual trick of bait and debate is tolerated by most, but a statement like that leaves no room for manoeuvre.
If you're still here by the end of the weekend, I'd be both surprised and disappointed in b3ta.
Captain Howdy,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:18,
archived)
The b3ta lineno one knows where it is but you know when it's been crossed
( Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:24,
archived)
It was crossedfor me way back when Micheal Ellis found the previous child porn from this user. But B3ta, for some reason, gave them another chance.
(
TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:28,
archived)
I'll be surprised if the mods allow this to continue
(
Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:36,
archived)
In their defence, it wasn't something they posted on b3ta, merely found elsewhere and linked to by someone else.But any indifference I had towards Moggy evaporated in this statement:
www.b3ta.com/board/10863122
My opinion, (and I don't expect others to agree with it), is no more chances, no more naughty steps.
(www.b3ta.com/board/10863122
My opinion, (and I don't expect others to agree with it), is no more chances, no more naughty steps.
Captain Howdy,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:49,
archived)
It looks like someone has removed the link as wellTo the ass burger squirrel, that is
(
Ham o' Shatner -.-- --- ..- .-. / .- .-.. .-.. / --. .- -.--,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:52,
archived)
I think a mod would have posted a [mod edit]looks like moggy has clicked that links to child porn are not ok
( Paul_P http://www.Paul-hub.com,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:56,
archived)
He knew that anyway.'I never forgive Micheal Ellis' was made into T-shirts for christsake. Moggy is either very brave as a troll, very stupid, or very ill.
( TheSundaeLunch I'm a fucking shrub, alright?,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 15:10,
archived)
I think you could compete for "missing the point entirely" at a national levelI have not looked at the linked image given your reputation. From what I hear it looks like child pornography. It is illegal in this country for a very good reason.
Images of child pornography promote child abuse as it normalises it, giving predators more justification to abuse rather than seek help. Child pornography has an even more sinister element to it; the trivialisation of consent. Children cannot consent to these acts as they are not emotionally mature enough to understand the consequences of such actions and neither do they possess the knowledge and experience of the world to make a reasoned decision in this regard. This makes child pornography extremely dangerous in any context.
For these reasons, your "is not child" [sic] excuse is a complete load of bollocks. Quite frankly I'm appalled that I'm having to explain this to an adult.
(Images of child pornography promote child abuse as it normalises it, giving predators more justification to abuse rather than seek help. Child pornography has an even more sinister element to it; the trivialisation of consent. Children cannot consent to these acts as they are not emotionally mature enough to understand the consequences of such actions and neither do they possess the knowledge and experience of the world to make a reasoned decision in this regard. This makes child pornography extremely dangerous in any context.
For these reasons, your "is not child" [sic] excuse is a complete load of bollocks. Quite frankly I'm appalled that I'm having to explain this to an adult.
sicanjal YOUR ALL NOT PLEBS,
Sat 13 Oct 2012, 14:38,
archived)
