![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
Photograph it with a decent camera, then take it to photoshop. I did this with some negatives about 6 years ago. Turned out pretty well?
( ,
Wed 10 Apr 2013, 11:20,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
hence why we've got the glass plates out of the strong room, but there's no way i'm going to get away with that en masse with a camera
( ,
Wed 10 Apr 2013, 11:33,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
then take macro images of the neg, probably get away with 6 images to approach 1:1 magnification and stitch the resulting images together into a multimegapixel image before taking it to photoshop.
You may need a tripod. The first one or two will be difficult (both to photograph and to process), but you'll then get into a routine.
( ,
Wed 10 Apr 2013, 11:40,
archived)
You may need a tripod. The first one or two will be difficult (both to photograph and to process), but you'll then get into a routine.
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
all that sounds like me having to do it myself with time I literally don't have, hence why we bought a rather nifty flat bed scanner. But it simply wasn't designed to deal with anything as antiquated as 4 by 3 glass negatives :/
Back to the drawing board
( ,
Wed 10 Apr 2013, 11:59,
archived)
Back to the drawing board
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
It was basically a light box that sat on top of the scanner with the negative underneath, and the scanner used that for illumination rather than the usual built-in light source.
( ,
Wed 10 Apr 2013, 12:09,
archived)
![link to this post #](/images/board_posticon.gif)
( ,
Wed 10 Apr 2013, 12:30,
archived)