Home » Messageboard »
XXX » Message 1367878
(Thread )
dunno
I guess we'd need a rainbow to reflect everyones colour. I guess we could skip the infrared and ultraviolet though.
(
rob ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:01,
archived )
leaving out the invisible man
and his family? They have rights to you know.
(
Dr Drink ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:04,
archived )
If the invisible man shagged a normal lady
would they have opaque kiddies?
(
rob ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:07,
archived )
no
invisibility is the dominant gene. They'd be as transparent as their father.
(
Dr Drink ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:09,
archived )
surely
they would be translucent?
(
Flower has a new job! ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:31,
archived )
you mean translucent.
We are all opaque :)
(
Lumpbucket tekcubpmuL ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:47,
archived )
Rights
to you know what?
(
Ijon Tichy ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:09,
archived )
yay
score one for the grammar police
(
norumbegan ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 23:54,
archived )
for some reason I like the idea
of all the BNP nutters flying a rainbow flag
(
LP ,
Wed 11 Jun 2003, 13:19,
archived )
isn't that
um, the gay pride flag?
(
Mingus wonders where all the time went ,
Thu 12 Jun 2003, 12:21,
archived )
that may
be the reason yes... :-) Apparently a mate of mine once mistook a BNP march for a gay pride event, apparently he was confused by the large quantity of skinheads wearing leather.
(
LP ,
Thu 12 Jun 2003, 15:46,
archived )
re: the flag
it was you paul wasn't it!
(
Retford Tourist Board ,
Fri 13 Jun 2003, 13:44,
archived )
Hide
Hide post If you want to unhide this post later, click the "update profile" link in the top navigation bar, and scroll down to the bottom.
Ignore
Shush them a week You will be blisfully unaware of this user for just one week
Mute user You will not see this users messages again
Block user You will not see them and they will not see you