that's a bit small
and a bith fast to be readable
(
Dr. Kitteny Berk almost certainly drunk,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:34,
archived)
sorry
my monitor is at a decent res
(
Dr. Kitteny Berk almost certainly drunk,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:36,
archived)
mines at 1280x1024
and i still got it after 3 or 4 times round :P
(
lemony,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:37,
archived)
mines at
1600*1200 (or 2048 * 1536 is i need the space)
and it took about 5 goes, which is still a bit pointless
(
Dr. Kitteny Berk almost certainly drunk,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:38,
archived)
oooooh
whos got a posh video card (or runs linux)
(
lemony,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:39,
archived)
pah and me with my
9200 pro (which only cost £35)
(
lemony,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:44,
archived)
the pic is about 2.5 cm accross
and 2cm high
im at 800x600
(
DeviousMiscreant,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:38,
archived)
at 1024 x 768
it's about 2cmwide, and 1.75 cm high
(
Or is it?,
Sat 8 Nov 2003, 22:39,
archived)